Skip to content

Life With Father (1947)

Cover of "Life with Father"
Maybe I wasn’t in the right mindset to watch Life With Father; I watched it right after To Kill a Mockingbird, so I had the bar set pretty high.  Or maybe it’s because I love Meet Me in St. Louis, which also deals with a turn-of-the-century family.  Regardless, I found Life With Father to be a tedious affair powered by William Powell and a 14-year-old Elizabeth Taylor.  There are particular moments of fun, but the rote characterization and plot never go anywhere, keeping it hard to maintain your attention for two-hours.

In nineteenth-century New York, the father (William Powell) of a wealthy family is forced to deal with his wife (Irene Dunne) and children’s problems on a daily basis.  To complicate matters, a series of unwelcome house-guests threaten his peace and solitude.

In the interest of full disclosure, I’m writing this review two months after I saw the film, so if I confuse details it’s because I’m going off my memory and my notes.  Life With Father is incredibly stagy (adapted from the long-running play by Howard Lindsay and Russell Crouse) with grand entrances made by all which become hokey and routine by the half-way mark.  The only actor whose entrance works to his advantage is Powell.  The camera shoots his feet first and rises up, to have the audience take in the intimidation and bluster that is Powell.  Of course, this is contradicted when the audience gets a load of ginger-haired Powell.  It’s obviously a bad dye job and just looks like he colored his hair at home and turned it orange.  All of this sweeping grandiosity is preceded by the various already introduced family members ominously talking about Father to foreshadow his appearance.  He becomes an urban legend with each story increasing the fear of the character.  Powell excelled at comedy, or at least being the man with a dark side which was undone with his charming personality.  As Clarence Day, none of that is on display.  and his greed and bluster come off as mean.  He’s akin to Ebenezer Scrooge only everyday is Christmas.

There is a bit of wry humor that appears to place this in the screwball vein; this is a film about first-world problems.  For example, Vinnie is horrified to discover that Clarence is negotiating the price of the “best” pew for the family to sit in during church, with the joke being that pews are being bought at all.  I also found that religion gets poked fun of quite a bit, although never in a mean-spirited way.  When the family discusses going to Heaven, they talk as if they’re planning a family vacation.  I have to wonder if 1947 audiences found it as weird as 2013 audiences might?  A key subplot is Clarence’s refusal to be baptized, placing Vinnie’s entire world into upheaval; she starts to question “maybe we’re not even married.”  Irene Dunne is the straight man of the picture, and she has some fun, yet unremarkable, chemistry with Powell.  Much of it could be the prim and proper nature of the time, but Powell and Dunne aren’t as in-sync as Powell and his other female co-stars.  You expect the climax to focus on Vinnie’s struggle to overcome an illness – it would be a logical conclusion – but 30 minutes of plot remain involving Clarence flip-flopping on the baptism question.

The additional thirty minutes is included to wrap-up everyone’s storylines, and none are compelling.  One of the sons has trouble with the violin and there’s an additional plot involving the Day house-guest, Mary (Elizabeth Taylor).  Taylor’s character is chronically naïve, and it’s a nuisance complicated by her squeaky pitch.  On top of that there’s an underutilized Upstairs, Downstairs narrative with the help that relies on characters going through the scene but never actively engaging in them.

Life With Father is life as usual, neither spectacular nor terrible.  William Powell’s bluster mutes his personality and several times he’s just rude.  Irene Dunne is a solid straight man and both Powell and Dunne turn Life With Father into a watchable experience.  The problem lies in the humdrum story that feels like a slice-of-life tale, but only shows how boring an average family can be.

Ronnie Rating:


Interested in purchasing today’s film?  If you use the handy link below a small portion will be donated to this site!  Thanks!

Life with Father

Kristen Lopez View All

A freelance film critic whose work fuels the Rotten Tomatoes meter. I've been published on The Hollywood Reporter, Remezcla, and The Daily Beast. I've been featured in the L.A. Times. I currently run two podcasts, Citizen Dame and Ticklish Business.

13 thoughts on “Life With Father (1947) Leave a comment

  1. I couldn’t agree more. I have tried several times to watch this movie, but I just can’t get through it. It’s one of those films that you feel you “should” like because so many other people do, but I just don’t.


    • You took the words out of my mouth, Kelly! I always feel terrible giving a negative review to a film where I can understand the affection, then again that’s why I’m reviewing from my perspective lol.


  2. I love this movie! Maybe it’s just because I love William Powell and the word “poppycock.” I also saw it when I was 12, so that might color my interpretation just a bit 🙂


  3. I’m one of those who counts “Life With Father” as a particular favourite, enjoying Clarence Day’s stories about his eccentric parents and an era long past. Lindsay and Crouse’s play was the longest running on Broadway for many years and the movie version was big news in its day. Bette Davis even tested for Vinnie she wanted it so badly.

    Lines from the movie have become part of my family. “Madame, I am the character of my home.” “If there’s one place the church should leave alone, it’s a man’s soul.” Father’s solitary rant at politicians/newspapers so reminds me of folks I know, and the way it is accepted as normal cracks me up every time.

    The scene with Clare and Vinnie singing together on the settee as twilight falls always makes me tear up.

    For me, “Life With Father” is a movie of infinite pleasures.


  4. Sorry you didn’t care for the film. It is one of my favorites. The relationship between Clarence and Vinnie I think is sweet. In spite of their differences on some things (his baptism particularly) I can feel the love. I agree with Patricia about their scene on the settee.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: