Skip to content

Spooky Season 2021: The Invisible Man (1933)

Originally published April 17th, 2012

I am shocked and astounded at the recent spike in readers this blog has found.  For the last three days we’ve consistently cracked 100 hits which is a bit feat for me (watch the numbers plunge as soon as I hit “publish”).  Today’s review is a classic Universal movie from 1933, the James Whale film The Invisible Man.  Now, I haven’t read the classic book but I’ve heard the film is a close adaptation.  With that, the film is fun due to the amazing voice acting by Claude Rains, and is easily just shy of Frankenstein or Dracula.  It’s a bit too close to Frankenstein for my liking but it’s a fun watch.  Keep reading for the review and also the update on our upcoming Best Actor Tourney!

I wanted to see this for the sheer fact that I’ve never seen Claude Rain play anything other than the Inspector from Casablanca.  He does an amazing job taking a role that doesn’t require him to be on-screen, and creating a character you believe you can feel and visualize.  Rains wasn’t the first choice, Frankenstein star Boris Karloff was, but I couldn’t see anyone other than Rains playing this role.  He takes his extensive theater acting (this was his first sound film) and applies that here with aplomb.  The role requires a clear, eloquent voice, and while he’s not always playing the man on-screen his carriage and broad theatrical gestures work so well.  His mannerisms make certain scenes utterly disturbing.  Case in point, the moment where he reveals himself to the inhabitants of the inn is unsettling as he rapidly rips off the bandages while maniacally laughing.  Even his entering the inn for the first time conveys an air of menace as he walks in almost mechanically/unreal.  For 1933 the effects work and still hold up today.  The reveal happens about five minutes into this clip:

The movie does play on the typical horror tropes established by 1933 and at times feels like a continuation of Frankenstein; I’m not sure how intentional director James Whale (who also directed Frankenstein) intended that to be.  The movie opens with the typical snoopy English pub owners, epitomized by the annoying hysterical innkeeper’s wife (Una O’Connor) who does nothing but scream and screech.  If that was her only intention lady you win!  I was just waiting for the Invisible Man to throw her down the stairs.  Other similarities to Frankenstein include the elements of man messing with “things best left alone!”  You also have the misunderstood/murderous loner, and the unsympathetic townspeople.  It didn’t lessen my overall enjoyment of the film but I did keep saying “Wow, these movies are pretty interchangeable aside from the problems the men face.”

Where this movie diverges most is what the intent of the invisible man means to society.  The man behind the bandages, scientist Jack Griffin, details his plot to take over the world and “commit a few murders here and there.”  His belief is that “an invisible man can rule the world” as he can come and go as he pleases and watch over everything.  The allusions to Big Brother and 1984 are easily spotted here and I have to wonder if there’s some type of insidious war message although WWII hadn’t started.

The movie does have a few flaws that are pretty funny.  What all these invisible man movies do is throw in a few too many “side abilities” to create more menace.  I hate to name drop Hollow Man, which is a pretty horrid but laughable attempt to remake this film, but that movie included the element that invisibility can make you want to rape people!  Here we have the requisite madness but Griffin continuously mentions “I’m going to hurt you, I’m super strong!”  So with invisibility comes super strength?  And it also makes you able to be in about 30 places at once to throw things.  You have another scene where he throws ink in a cop’s face, mind you people are huddled around this guy so how did Griffin get in front of him, and how did he climb on top of the wooden table without anyone hearing him?  Not related to Griffin but the funniest line has to be said cop telling people “We found no sign of him.”  Really, because I totally thought an invisible man would leave SOME trace of himself…crack detective work there!

If this was a crappy story this moments would bother me but they just make me smile.  The rest of the story is so quick, the movie clocks in at an hour and 15 minutes, that you ignore the problems and just chalk it up to “English people!”  The Invisible Man is a worthy watch and if you’re seeing Titanic in 3D, it’s got Gloria Stuart playing the BEAUTIFUL Flora!  Literally stunning was she!

Ronnie Rating:



Interested in Learning More About Us??

Follow Ticklish Business on Twitter, Facebook, Letterboxd and Instagram. We also have special video content available on our YouTube channel. 

Interested in supporting us? Check out our Patreon Page! Perks include giveaways, early access and additional bonus content! 

Our podcast episodes are available wherever you listen to podcasts, including: Apple Podcasts, Spotify and Podbean

Kristen Lopez View All

A freelance film critic whose work fuels the Rotten Tomatoes meter. I've been published on The Hollywood Reporter, Remezcla, and The Daily Beast. I've been featured in the L.A. Times. I currently run two podcasts, Citizen Dame and Ticklish Business.

18 thoughts on “Spooky Season 2021: The Invisible Man (1933) Leave a comment

  1. I finally saw this about 8 months ago. I thought the effects still held up pretty well.

    I had to laugh at your comment about the woman at the inn because I felt the same way. Man, did I hate her voice and I was wishing the invisible man would do something to her to get her out of the movie.

    Three other Rains’ performances I would recommend – The Adventures of Robin Hood where he is the hissingly evil Prince John; Mr. Smith Goes to Washington where he is a corrupt Senator; and Now, Voyager where he is a kindly and understanding therapist.

    • Chip, I’ve definitely put those three films on my To Watch list for the blog, I should have seen the latter two already as I know their seminal films! Thanks for the recommends!

  2. I thought the classic film,The Invisible Man had wonderful dialogue, acting and amazing special effects. Rains was perfect for the part.

    You should be very proud of your wonderful blog..

    • Aw thanks Dawn! I hope you’re staying strong by the way. I definitely need to see Rains in more and another commenter gave me some recommends I’ll be looking at in the future.

  3. I have not seen this, but I have seen James Whale’s Frankenstein as well as its sequel Son of Frankenstein though I haven’t seen Bride.

  4. See this classic horror tale produced as the story was meant to be told. There is only one Invisible Man by H G Wells. I have owned the rights to this novel since 2004 and will for life. WGA 1016755 2004-2021 © Pau-898-707 ( 9-8-04- for life.)

      • Thank you. My take is adapted almost directly from the novel. Fans deserve to see a movie based on the book the way H G Wells told the tale. We are going to do that. None of the Invisible Man movies has ever told the story the way Wells wrote it. Until now. The major flaw in every film so far has been that they forgot to mention that Jack Griffin is an albino. He is always played by an anglo but never someone with a skin pigment disorder.Jack never had time for romance either so a girlfriend in a movie is out. He didn’t have time.

      • It’s always surprising to see how Hollywood changes film adaptations. I must admit I haven’t read Wells’ version yet but it wouldn’t surprise me to know it’s been changed by Hollywood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: